|
Just call me Einstein because I have discovered the formula Tito uses to come up with his grades. Here it is:
-for WCW. BAD SHOW+ BADMOUTHING IN PDC= B-
-for WWF. GREAT SHOW+ PRAISING IN PDC = B+
Wow, odd system isn't it?.
Monday Night Reactions:
WCW
Tito said: I can't even look at that World Title with respect.
I say: I stopped having respect for that thing when Arquette won.
Tito Says: It's a great reason why the ratings continue to be low each week...bad decision making baby
.
I say: Bad wrestling and angles is why ratings suck.
Okay, how can Tito bash WCW for about 4 paragraphs and still give them a B-? He must be that damn ignorant. And he is telling everybody he is not a WCW mark?
WWF
Wow calling Val Venis a lameduck champ, LOOK AT WCW'S TITLEHOLDERS---- THAT'S LAMEDUCK
"Not good here for such a recycled feud"... talking about Kane and Taker. Okay, I forgot WCW never recycles their own matches; they just recycle old WWF angles. Oh wait, Booker T vs JJ for what? 4 PPV's in a row?
"Shane is DEAD MEAT at Summerslam against his boy, Steve Blackman."- Tito, watch Summerslam 99 and say that comment again you fool.
Now domestic abuse on women in wrestling- IT'S A SHOW- THEY ARE NOT TRYING TO HURT THEM MORAN- IT'S ENTERTAINMENT- GEE, WHEN IT HAPPENS ON REGULAR TV SHOWS NO ONE CARES ABOUT IT!!!
Tito- you are an anamoly, saying how much WCW sucked last night and giving them a B-, then saying how much WWF was great and giving them a B+. For your column, I will give you a 62.2 for at least acknowledging WWF is better.
O Titrm
|
